Notes: We will be looking at the history of diamonds and examining how their price is derived considering their characteristics.
data(diamonds)
## Warning in data(diamonds): data set 'diamonds' not found
library(ggplot2)
ggplot(data=diamonds, aes(x=carat, y=price)) +
geom_point(alpha = 1/4, fill='brown', color='black') +
xlim(0, quantile(diamonds$carat, probs=0.99)) +
ylim(0, quantile(diamonds$price, probs = 0.99)) +
scale_color_brewer(type='qual')
## Warning: Removed 926 rows containing missing values (geom_point).
Response: The graph is not linear but the exact relationship is hard to determine. The variance in price also increase with carat of the diamond. ***
Notes:
Forever!
Notes: Best marketing and most successful cartel ever!
Notes:
# install these if necessary
# load the ggplot graphics package and the others
library(ggplot2)
library(GGally)
library(scales)
library(memisc)
## Loading required package: lattice
## Loading required package: MASS
##
## Attaching package: 'memisc'
## The following object is masked from 'package:scales':
##
## percent
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
##
## contr.sum, contr.treatment, contrasts
## The following object is masked from 'package:base':
##
## as.array
# sample 10,000 diamonds from the data set
set.seed(20022012)
diamond_samp <- diamonds[sample(1:length(diamonds$price), 10000), ]
ggpairs(diamond_samp,
lower = list(continuous = wrap("points", shape=I(','))),
upper = list(combo=wrap("box", outlier.shape=I('.'))), axisLabels = 'internal')
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
What are some things you notice in the ggpairs output? Response: The price of diamonds is strongly correlated with the carat and the x,y, and z dimensions of the diamond. Since the wight (carat) of the diamond is strongly related to the size, we should be interested in the cube root of the carat of a diamond.
Notes: The variance in the price of diamonds really increases with diamonds above 1 carat.
library(gridExtra)
p1 <- ggplot(data=diamonds, aes(x=price)) +
geom_histogram(binwidth=100, fill='blue') +
ggtitle('Price')
p2 <- ggplot(data=diamonds, aes(x=price)) +
geom_histogram(binwidth=0.01, fill='red') +
scale_x_log10() +
ggtitle('Price (log10)')
grid.arrange(p1, p2, ncol=1)
Notes: The log of the price shows a more dispersed distribution. There are two spikes in the log graph. This implies that people of different financial status buy two different price points of diamonds.
cuberoot_trans = function() trans_new('cuberoot', transform = function(x) x^(1/3), inverse = function(x) x^3)
ggplot(aes((carat)^(1/3), price), data = diamonds) +
geom_point() +
scale_x_continuous(limits = c(0.2, 3),
breaks = c(0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3)) +
scale_y_continuous(trans = log10_trans(), limits = c(350, 15000),
breaks = c(350, 1000, 5000, 10000, 15000)) +
ggtitle('Price (log10) by Cube-Root of Carat') +
xlab('Cube root of Carat')
## Warning: Removed 1672 rows containing missing values (geom_point).
head(sort(table(diamonds$carat), decreasing = T))
##
## 0.3 0.31 1.01 0.7 0.32 1
## 2604 2249 2242 1981 1840 1558
head(sort(table(diamonds$price), decreasing = T))
##
## 605 802 625 828 776 698
## 132 127 126 125 124 121
ggplot(aes(carat^(1/3), price), data = diamonds) +
geom_point(alpha = 1/2, size= 3/4, position = 'jitter') +
scale_x_continuous(limits = c(0.2, 3),
breaks = c(0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3)) +
scale_y_continuous(trans = log10_trans(), limits = c(350, 15000),
breaks = c(350, 1000, 5000, 10000, 15000)) +
ggtitle('Price (log10) by Cube-Root of Carat')
## Warning: Removed 1673 rows containing missing values (geom_point).
Notes: The cut and clarity of a diamond also have an effect on its price.
Alter the code below.
# install and load the RColorBrewer package
library(RColorBrewer)
ggplot(aes(x = carat, y = price, color=clarity), data = diamonds) +
geom_point(alpha = 0.5, size = 1, position = 'jitter') +
scale_color_brewer(type = 'div',
guide = guide_legend(title = 'Clarity', reverse = T,
override.aes = list(alpha = 1, size = 2))) +
scale_x_continuous(trans = cuberoot_trans(), limits = c(0.2, 3),
breaks = c(0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3)) +
scale_y_continuous(trans = log10_trans(), limits = c(350, 15000),
breaks = c(350, 1000, 5000, 10000, 15000)) +
ggtitle('Price (log10) by Cube-Root of Carat and Clarity')
## Warning: Removed 1693 rows containing missing values (geom_point).
Response: Clarity has an effect on price because the clarity defines regions of the price vs carat graph. The top region is almost all IF clarity while the bottom region is I1 clarity.
Alter the code below.
ggplot(aes(x = carat, y = price, color = cut), data = diamonds) +
geom_point(alpha = 0.5, size = 1, position = 'jitter') +
scale_color_brewer(type = 'div',
guide = guide_legend(title = 'Cut', reverse = T,
override.aes = list(alpha = 1, size = 2))) +
scale_x_continuous(trans = cuberoot_trans(), limits = c(0.2, 3),
breaks = c(0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3)) +
scale_y_continuous(trans = log10_trans(), limits = c(350, 15000),
breaks = c(350, 1000, 5000, 10000, 15000)) +
ggtitle('Price (log10) by Cube-Root of Carat and Cut')
## Warning: Removed 1696 rows containing missing values (geom_point).
Response: Cut does account for some of the variance in price because the ideal cuts are at the top of the price range while the fair cut diamonds are the lowest.
Alter the code below.
ggplot(aes(x = carat, y = price, color = color), data = diamonds) +
geom_point(alpha = 0.5, size = 1, position = 'jitter') +
scale_color_brewer(type = 'div',
guide = guide_legend(title = 'Color',
override.aes = list(alpha = 1, size = 2))) +
scale_x_continuous(trans = cuberoot_trans(), limits = c(0.2, 3),
breaks = c(0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3)) +
scale_y_continuous(trans = log10_trans(), limits = c(350, 15000),
breaks = c(350, 1000, 5000, 10000, 15000)) +
ggtitle('Price (log10) by Cube-Root of Carat and Color')
## Warning: Removed 1688 rows containing missing values (geom_point).
Response: Color does seem to have an effect on price because the diamonds with the best color, D, are at the top of the price vs carat graph.
Notes: We can use the lm(y~x) function to make linear regressions and have predictive models.
Response:
Notes: The “I” wrapper inside the m1 statement tells lm that we want the expressions as they are and we are not entering a formula.
m1 <- lm(I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)), data = diamonds)
m2 <- update(m1, ~ . + carat)
m3 <- update(m2, ~ . + cut)
m4 <- update(m3, ~ . + color)
m5 <- update(m4, ~ . + clarity)
mtable(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, sdigits=3)
##
## Calls:
## m1: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)), data = diamonds)
## m2: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)) + carat, data = diamonds)
## m3: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)) + carat + cut, data = diamonds)
## m4: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)) + carat + cut + color,
## data = diamonds)
## m5: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)) + carat + cut + color +
## clarity, data = diamonds)
##
## =============================================================================
## m1 m2 m3 m4 m5
## -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
## (Intercept) 2.821*** 1.039*** 0.874*** 0.932*** 0.415***
## (0.006) (0.019) (0.019) (0.017) (0.010)
## I(carat^(1/3)) 5.558*** 8.568*** 8.703*** 8.438*** 9.144***
## (0.007) (0.032) (0.031) (0.028) (0.016)
## carat -1.137*** -1.163*** -0.992*** -1.093***
## (0.012) (0.011) (0.010) (0.006)
## cut: .L 0.224*** 0.224*** 0.120***
## (0.004) (0.004) (0.002)
## cut: .Q -0.062*** -0.062*** -0.031***
## (0.004) (0.003) (0.002)
## cut: .C 0.051*** 0.052*** 0.014***
## (0.003) (0.003) (0.002)
## cut: ^4 0.018*** 0.018*** -0.002
## (0.003) (0.002) (0.001)
## color: .L -0.373*** -0.441***
## (0.003) (0.002)
## color: .Q -0.129*** -0.093***
## (0.003) (0.002)
## color: .C 0.001 -0.013***
## (0.003) (0.002)
## color: ^4 0.029*** 0.012***
## (0.003) (0.002)
## color: ^5 -0.016*** -0.003*
## (0.003) (0.001)
## color: ^6 -0.023*** 0.001
## (0.002) (0.001)
## clarity: .L 0.907***
## (0.003)
## clarity: .Q -0.240***
## (0.003)
## clarity: .C 0.131***
## (0.003)
## clarity: ^4 -0.063***
## (0.002)
## clarity: ^5 0.026***
## (0.002)
## clarity: ^6 -0.002
## (0.002)
## clarity: ^7 0.032***
## (0.001)
## -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
## R-squared 0.924 0.935 0.939 0.951 0.984
## adj. R-squared 0.924 0.935 0.939 0.951 0.984
## sigma 0.280 0.259 0.250 0.224 0.129
## F 652012.063 387489.366 138654.523 87959.467 173791.084
## p 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
## Log-likelihood -7962.499 -3631.319 -1837.416 4235.240 34091.272
## Deviance 4242.831 3613.360 3380.837 2699.212 892.214
## AIC 15930.999 7270.637 3690.832 -8442.481 -68140.544
## BIC 15957.685 7306.220 3761.997 -8317.942 -67953.736
## N 53940 53940 53940 53940 53940
## =============================================================================
Notice how adding cut to our model does not help explain much of the variance in the price of diamonds. This fits with out exploration earlier.
Video Notes: The model for predicting diamond prices that was obtained from this data set is shown above with the coefficients corresponding to the different variables.
Response: Some problems with this model are: * It does not account for fluctuating prices over time because of macro economic influences. * It does not consider supply fluctuations because of rising demand in new markets such as China. * No consideration for inflation. * Prices grew unevenly for different carats after the 2008 recession.
Notes:
library('bitops')
library('RCurl')
diamondsBig <- read.csv('diamondsbig.csv')
The code used to obtain the data is available here: https://github.com/solomonm/diamonds-data
Notes: Let’s build the same linear regression models using this new database of more and newer information.
m1 <- lm(I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)), data = diamondsBig[diamondsBig$price < 10000 & diamondsBig$cert == 'GIA',])
m2 <- update(m1, ~ .+carat)
m3 <- update(m2, ~.+cut)
m4 <- update(m3, ~.+color)
m5 <- update(m4, ~.+clarity)
mtable(m1, m2, m3, m4, m5, sdigits=3)
##
## Calls:
## m1: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)), data = diamondsBig[diamondsBig$price <
## 10000 & diamondsBig$cert == "GIA", ])
## m2: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)) + carat, data = diamondsBig[diamondsBig$price <
## 10000 & diamondsBig$cert == "GIA", ])
## m3: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)) + carat + cut, data = diamondsBig[diamondsBig$price <
## 10000 & diamondsBig$cert == "GIA", ])
## m4: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)) + carat + cut + color,
## data = diamondsBig[diamondsBig$price < 10000 & diamondsBig$cert ==
## "GIA", ])
## m5: lm(formula = I(log(price)) ~ I(carat^(1/3)) + carat + cut + color +
## clarity, data = diamondsBig[diamondsBig$price < 10000 & diamondsBig$cert ==
## "GIA", ])
##
## =================================================================================
## m1 m2 m3 m4 m5
## ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## (Intercept) 2.671*** 1.333*** 0.949*** 1.341*** 0.665***
## (0.003) (0.012) (0.012) (0.010) (0.007)
## I(carat^(1/3)) 5.839*** 8.243*** 8.633*** 8.110*** 8.320***
## (0.004) (0.022) (0.021) (0.017) (0.012)
## carat -1.061*** -1.223*** -0.782*** -0.763***
## (0.009) (0.009) (0.007) (0.005)
## cut: Ideal 0.211*** 0.181*** 0.131***
## (0.002) (0.001) (0.001)
## cut: V.Good 0.120*** 0.090*** 0.071***
## (0.002) (0.001) (0.001)
## color: E/D -0.083*** -0.071***
## (0.001) (0.001)
## color: F/D -0.125*** -0.105***
## (0.001) (0.001)
## color: G/D -0.178*** -0.162***
## (0.001) (0.001)
## color: H/D -0.243*** -0.225***
## (0.002) (0.001)
## color: I/D -0.361*** -0.358***
## (0.002) (0.001)
## color: J/D -0.500*** -0.509***
## (0.002) (0.001)
## color: K/D -0.689*** -0.710***
## (0.002) (0.002)
## color: L/D -0.812*** -0.827***
## (0.003) (0.002)
## clarity: I2 -0.301***
## (0.006)
## clarity: IF 0.751***
## (0.002)
## clarity: SI1 0.426***
## (0.002)
## clarity: SI2 0.306***
## (0.002)
## clarity: VS1 0.590***
## (0.002)
## clarity: VS2 0.534***
## (0.002)
## clarity: VVS1 0.693***
## (0.002)
## clarity: VVS2 0.633***
## (0.002)
## ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## R-squared 0.888 0.892 0.899 0.937 0.969
## adj. R-squared 0.888 0.892 0.899 0.937 0.969
## sigma 0.289 0.284 0.275 0.216 0.154
## F 2700903.714 1406538.330 754405.425 423311.488 521161.443
## p 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
## Log-likelihood -60137.791 -53996.269 -43339.818 37830.414 154124.270
## Deviance 28298.689 27291.534 25628.285 15874.910 7992.720
## AIC 120281.582 108000.539 86691.636 -75632.827 -308204.540
## BIC 120313.783 108043.473 86756.037 -75482.557 -307968.400
## N 338946 338946 338946 338946 338946
## =================================================================================
Example Diamond from BlueNile: Round 1.00 Very Good I VS1 $5,601
#Be sure you’ve loaded the library memisc and have m5 saved as an object in your workspace.
thisDiamond = data.frame(carat = 1.00, cut = "V.Good",
color = "I", clarity="VS1")
modelEstimate = predict(m5, newdata = thisDiamond,
interval="prediction", level = .95)
exp(modelEstimate)
## fit lwr upr
## 1 5040.436 3730.34 6810.638
Evaluate how well the model predicts the BlueNile diamond’s price. Think about the fitted point estimate as well as the 95% CI.
Response: The fitted point is lower than the actual value and has a 10% error. The price does fall inside the 95% CI but the CI seems conservative.
One way to create a better estimating model is to include only diamonds with carat between 0.5 and 1.5 from the dataset. ***
Notes:
Click KnitHTML to see all of your hard work and to have an html page of this lesson, your answers, and your notes!